 |
If we really want to be impartial in giving an historical
judgement, we must bear in mind the real seriousness
of the Jacobins’ treason both towards the lawful
sovereigns and towards the people of the Kingdom;
this seriousness was even worsened by the fact that
they gave the State in the hands of an invader enemy
and, most of all, to the sovereigns these traitors
were mostly noble people and often friends of the
royal couple and had received benefits from them.

Duke Michele Pezza,
called Fra Diavolo |
If
we could have an instantaneous overview of the
Kingdom of Naples in the first six months of
1799, we would see tenths of thousands of people
rise up voluntarily from Abruzzo and southern
Lazio to Apulia and Calabria and fight to death
against the Jacobin Republic and the Napoleonic
invader in the name of the Church and the Bourbon
Two Sicilies. Just to mention a few names among
the most famous heads of pro-Bourbon rising
we should list Fra Diavolo (Friar Devil), G.B.
Rodio, Giuseppe Pronio, Vito Nunziante ,
Sciarpa, Panedigrano, etc. We must also mention
the great war fought from 1806 to 1810 by the
French against the so-called southern pro-Bourbon
"Brigandage" to support first Joseph
Bonaparte and then Joachim Murat on the Throne
of Naples. |
It is a tragic history, characterised by bloody massacres,
unscrupulous retaliations, dramatic and rude events.
Apulia, Basilicata and especially Calabria rose up
and created a real situation of permanent war. The
insurgents, led by some heroes of ‘99 (again,
Michele Pezza ,
Sciabolone, De Donatis, G.B. Rodio ,
Sciarpa, Panedigrano, the protagonists of the Holy
Faith (Sanfedists) who after seven years did not hesitate
to leave again their families and jobs and all the
privileges acquired to face death in a desperate war
only to serve the same cause as seven years before,
the same King against the same enemy), plus other
new counterrevolutionary exponents among which I mention
Carmine Caligiuri, Rodolfo Mirabelli, Alessandro Mandarini
and others. Supported by the British via sea, they
faced for years the French-Neapolitan armies and were
engaged in real battles "on a grand scale",
such as the one they won at Maida. At the end they
were defeated, but Murat never obtained peace and
support from his subjects: as we already said when
talking of Ferdinand IV, when Murat landed at Pizzo
and attempted to reconquer the kingdom in 1815 was
shot by local peasants, then arrested, processed and
condemned to death.
The uprising was an exceptional occasion for many
humble commoners to show their heroic loyalty to their
sovereigns, as well as for others (nobles and lords)
to show their treason to their sovereigns and benefactors.
Some considerations

Marquis Vito Nunziante |
We
cannot relate in detail these events for lack
of space here, but some short general considerations
must be made. The trend applied by Italian historiography
to all other heroic and tragic events of the
Italian uprising - that occurred almost everywhere
across the country in those 25 years we are
analysing - was that of "concealing"
them. However, this was not possible for the
Ruffo expedition and Sanfedismo due to the epochal
dimensions of these phenomena and therefore
in this case the trend was that of "calumniating"
them : Ruffo’s followers where only bloodthirsty
criminal and murderous gangs looking for easy
plunder and Ruffo was the leader they deserved. |
Of course we cannot deny that among them there were
real criminals and brigands, too; and in fact the
Cardinal was strongly annoyed by that and often adopted
very strict measures to repress delinquent actions.
He always did whatever he could also to save the Jacobins
from the fury of his men, and it often occurred that
the republicans gave themselves up to him to escape
the revenge of Sanfedists. |